What do 90 municipalities cost?

St. Louis County is entertaining the idea of adding the City of St. Louis to its list of incorporated municipalities. All legal opinions firmly show that the County will absorb NONE of the City’s nancial responsibilities. If this were to happen the City of St. Louis will be no different than municipalities such as Clayton, Ellisville, or Chester eld. It would simply be another city located in St. Louis County. I am an advocate for this move. The City needs to cease County functions and turn them over to the County. Currently, practices and city functions run at inefficient levels.

If the city were to join the St. Louis County roster then we would have about 91 municipalities in the County. It should be noted though that 23 of them have less than 1,000 in population. Why does that make sense for a few blocks of St. Louis County to incorporate? If you ask them, they want to control their neighborhood, perhaps a worthy endeavor. However, we then have 90+ City Administrations for a population of 1.3 million (City and County). Some may suggest that this is very inefficient and a misuse of funds.  But how inefficient is it really?

(We work hard on this and sure would appreciate a “Like”)[iframe http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FStLouisRealEstateNews&send=false&layout=standard&width=50&show_faces=false&font&colorscheme=light&action=like&height=35&appId=537283152977556 100 35 ]

Search St Louis Homes For Sale HERE
See ALL Homes That Will Be Open In St Louis This Weekend
St Louis Market Data (Home Prices, Sales, Trends and MORE) By City, Zip or County

Better Together is a local group attempting to gather information regarding how this area compares with other areas. The private sector regularly compares its operations to its “Peer Group” in the hopes of discovering best practices. It would be hard to argue that the public sector should be exempt from this process of improving operations.

Preliminary data from Better Together compared the cost of municipal governments for St. Louis, Indianapolis, and Louisville. St. Louis is the largest, with a population of 1.3 million. Louisville sits at 750,000 and Indianapolis has a population of about 820,000. Better Together broke down government functions per capita. The data follows:

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 6.39.40 AM

How striking is that? St. Louis operations cost $590.53 per person, per year, more than Indianapolis! That means that St. Louis spends $778 million more per year on municipal system functions than our peer in Indianapolis. It costs St. Louis $2.528 billion to run our municipal system, nearly $778 million of which is potential waste. That number is an even bigger difference when compared to Louisville.

Both Indianapolis and Louisville have consolidated into County wide operations. They appear to be efficient and are currently experiencing significant growth, both in population and economic vitality. It is easier to get permits, licensing, etc. approved by both Indianapolis and Louisville municipal governments. Those of us in Commercial RE Development are frustrated every day by 90+ sets of different rules and approval processes. A central approval process would promote economic development.

So, if it costs St. Louis over $778 million per year of extra tax dollars to keep the current structure running, what do we get for that tax payer money? Clarkson Valley can oversee a resident’s deck permit; Town and County can control the amount of brick that is used on a new house being built; and Creve Coeur can keep out drive thrus on Olive Blvd.

Some municipalities claim the excess costs are because of the city, when in fact, adding the 300,000 plus city residents helps the numbers. The insistence of micro-control costs the area over $778 million per year, and inhibits development and stymies population growth.

Some may wonder why this excess spending is allowed. A portion of the blame can be attributed to phenomena such as NIMBY (not in my back yard) and the CAVE (citizens against virtually everything) people. These groups remain a vocal, political force all due to silence on others’ parts.

A large portion of these 90 municipalities cannot support themselves financially. They receive funding from the “pooled city sales tax” process, feeding o of sales tax from municipalities that have seen growth and continue to promote economic development.

St. Louis has a lot of work to do to attain efficiency:

  1. The city needs to stop assuming the roles of a county and merge with St. Louis County.
  2. Many of the 90 municipalities must consolidate into a much more efficient, smaller number of cities.
  3. Regional initiatives are needed to keep St. Louis’ younger talent here. This will also help to recruit new businesses which will in turn lead to a growth and diversification of our area.

If St. Louis can accomplish some of this, a large portion of wasted funds can be redeployed to worthy infrastructure, such as the Rams dome, convention business, and other initiatives that promote real economic vitality.

So St. Louis, what are we waiting for?

Mike Henja, Presiden and CEO Gundaker Commercial Group

Mike Hejna is a 60-year resident of the St. Louis area, a CCIM and President of Gundaker Commercial Group.  Gundaker Commercial Group is a St Louis based commercial real estate firm offering expert services in all disciplines of commercial real estate including brokerage, asset management and corporate services.   Mike can be reached at (636) 728-5101 or by email at mhejna@gundakercommercial.com.

📬 Stay Ahead of the St Louis Market

Get local real estate updates, trends & insights — as soon as they publish.

Homeowners, buyers, investors & agents rely on us for what really matters in STL real estate.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

📬 Want St Louis real estate updates as they drop?

Comments are closed.

St Louis Real Estate Search®         St Louis Home Values

St. Louis Real Estate News        Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc. - All Rights Reserved
St Louis Real Estate News is a Trademark of Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc.

Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc. 3636 South Geyer Road - Suite 100, St Louis, MO 63127 314-414-6000 - Licensed Real Estate Broker in Missouri

The owner and authors this site are providing the information on this web site for general informational purposes only and make no representations, warranties (expressed or implied) or guarantees of any kind whatsoever, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or of any information found by following any link on this site. Furthermore, the owner and authors of this site will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any errors or omissions in information on this site, nor for the availability of this information. Additionally the owner and authors of this site will not be liable for for any losses, injuries or damages in any way from the display or use of this information or as the result of following external links displayed on this site, or by responding to advertisements displayed, or contained, on this site In using this site, users acknowledge and agree that the information on this site does not constitute the provision of legal advice, tax advice, accounting services, investment advice, or professional consulting of any kind nor should it be construed as such. The information provided herein should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax, accounting, legal, or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action on this information, you should consult a qualified professional adviser to whom you have provided all of the facts applicable to your particular situation or question. None of the tax information on this web site is intended to be used nor can it be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
All of the information on this site is provided as is, with no assurance or guarantee of completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.
This site contains external links to other sites not owned or controlled by the owner of this site, therefore the owner of this site does not control or guarantee in any manner the accuracy or relevancy of any information obtained through following such links. Links contained on this site are for users convenience and users should exercise extreme caution when following links. Including a link on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the site linked to or any views or opinions expressed on the site, products or services offered on outside sites or the companies or organizations that own and operate outside sites.
This site may accept payment for advertising, for displaying advertisements, through affiliate relationships with companies or may receive referral fees or commissions from companies as a result of recommending or referring people to a website. This site may also accept free product samples, free services, gift cards or cash to review a product or service. All paid and sponsored content may not always be identified as such. Any product claim, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.