St Louis Home Price Index Increased 1.5 Percent In February From Year Ago

Dennis Norman

Report Cautions That Shadow Inventory and End of Tax Credit Program May Result in Further Declines – Predicts a 3.01 Percent Home Price Decline in St. Louis In Next 12 Months.
A report released today by First American CoreLogic shows that national home prices increased 0.3 percent in February 2010 compared to February 2009 and the home price index for St. Louis increased 1.50 percent in February 2010 compared to February 2009

firstamerican corelogic

On a month-over-month basis, the national average home price index fell by 2.0 percent in February 2010 compared to January 2010, which was steeper than the previous one-month decline of 1.6 percent from December to January. Prices are typically weak in the winter months, so seasonal effects may be driving this one-month change.

Highlights from the February 2010 Report:

  • Including distressed transactions, the peak-to-current change in the national HPI (from April 2006 to February 2010) is -30.6 percent. Excluding distressed properties, the peak-to-current change in the HPI is -21.7 percent.
  • When distressed sales were included, Idaho (-13.7) moved into first place as the top-ranked state for annual price depreciation in February, followed by Nevada (-12.9 percent), Florida (-8.5 percent), Illinois (-8.3) and Oregon (-7.7 percent). All of these states also showed month-over-month decreases in their HPI between January and February. The distressed share in Idaho increased by about 11 percentage points over the past year, pulling down the annual price appreciation. The HPI for Idaho excluding distressed sales showed a much smaller annual decline (-5.2 percent).
  • Excluding distressed sales, the worst five states for year-over-year price declines changes slightly. Nevada (-12.0 percent) is the top decliner, followed by Michigan (-9.1 percent), Florida (-7.5 percent), Arizona (-7.1 percent) and Utah (-5.8 percent).
  • The five best states for year-over-year price appreciation excluding distressed sales are North Dakota, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, California, and Maine.
  • Including distressed sales, 58 of the top 100 CBSAs declined on a year-over-year basis in February. This is down from 65 CBSAs in January. Orlando-Kissimmee, FL held the spot of top decliner, with a 14.8 percent year-over-year decline in February.

What Lies Ahead?

The CoreLogic report forecast was not as optimistic as it has been in the past and is showing a softer recvoery than in previous forecasts. The forecast calls for an increase in the inventory of homes for sale as interest rates are expected to rise, tax credits expire, and slower than expected sales over the winter due to the weather are all adding to the inventory.

Highlights from the forecast:

  • Home prices in St. Louis are epected to deline 3.01 percent in the coming 12 months.
  • After a modest increase this spring and summer, the national single-family combined index is projected to decline by 3.4 percent from February 2010 to February 2011 assuming the expiration of current Federal Housing Stimulus programs.
  • 29 of the 45 largest Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) are projected to experience continued price depreciation on a year-to-year basis according to the current forecast, compared to only 14 out of 45 in last month’s forecast.
  • Markets that are expected to experience the largest amount of price depreciation through February 2011 are Detroit (-16.4 percent), Seattle (-5.8 percent), Atlanta (-4.5 percent), Cleveland (-4.1 percent) and Indianapolis (-3.8 percent). Markets that are expected to experience the biggest appreciation are Denver (5.2 percent), Las Vegas (5.0 percent), Riverside, CA (3.0 percent), and Houston (3.0 percent).
  • The preponderance of distressed sales continues to exert downward pressure on the indices. When distressed sales are excluded from the data, the forecast becomes significantly more optimistic about the future direction of home prices outside of this market segment. The national HPI is projected to increase 4.9 percent year-to-year when these transactions are omitted from the analysis. The same is true of many states and CBSAs. For example, there is a 10-percentage point difference in the year-to-year HPI forecasts for California when distressed sales are included (-1.8 percent) compared to when they are not (8.0 percent.)

📬 Stay Ahead of the St Louis Market

Get local real estate updates, trends & insights — as soon as they publish.

Homeowners, buyers, investors & agents rely on us for what really matters in STL real estate.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

📬 Want St Louis real estate updates as they drop?

Leave a Reply

St Louis Real Estate Search®         St Louis Home Values

St. Louis Real Estate News        Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc. - All Rights Reserved
St Louis Real Estate News is a Trademark of Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc.

Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc. 3636 South Geyer Road - Suite 100, St Louis, MO 63127 314-414-6000 - Licensed Real Estate Broker in Missouri

The owner and authors this site are providing the information on this web site for general informational purposes only and make no representations, warranties (expressed or implied) or guarantees of any kind whatsoever, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or of any information found by following any link on this site. Furthermore, the owner and authors of this site will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any errors or omissions in information on this site, nor for the availability of this information. Additionally the owner and authors of this site will not be liable for for any losses, injuries or damages in any way from the display or use of this information or as the result of following external links displayed on this site, or by responding to advertisements displayed, or contained, on this site In using this site, users acknowledge and agree that the information on this site does not constitute the provision of legal advice, tax advice, accounting services, investment advice, or professional consulting of any kind nor should it be construed as such. The information provided herein should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax, accounting, legal, or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action on this information, you should consult a qualified professional adviser to whom you have provided all of the facts applicable to your particular situation or question. None of the tax information on this web site is intended to be used nor can it be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
All of the information on this site is provided as is, with no assurance or guarantee of completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.
This site contains external links to other sites not owned or controlled by the owner of this site, therefore the owner of this site does not control or guarantee in any manner the accuracy or relevancy of any information obtained through following such links. Links contained on this site are for users convenience and users should exercise extreme caution when following links. Including a link on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the site linked to or any views or opinions expressed on the site, products or services offered on outside sites or the companies or organizations that own and operate outside sites.
This site may accept payment for advertising, for displaying advertisements, through affiliate relationships with companies or may receive referral fees or commissions from companies as a result of recommending or referring people to a website. This site may also accept free product samples, free services, gift cards or cash to review a product or service. All paid and sponsored content may not always be identified as such. Any product claim, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.