The proposed bill, Board Bill Number 72, states that the cap has become ineffective over time, allowing large-scale absentee property owners to simply absorb the low penalty as a cost of doing business. If approved, Proposition V would allow the city to impose fines that scale with the severity of the violations, addressing longstanding issues of property neglect and disinvestment. The complete text of the bill is included below for readers to review in its entirety.
Alderwoman Velazquez highlighted the urgent need for change in a recent opinion editorial published in the St. Louis Business Journal. She pointed out that when first established, the $500 fine was a meaningful deterrent, equivalent to roughly $4,000 today. “Over time, though, the penalty has become negligible, and absentee property owners and landlords often find it easier to pay the fine than maintain their properties,” Velazquez wrote. The alderwoman argues that the inability to impose higher fines has left the city with few options to compel owners to maintain their properties, resulting in safety hazards, reduced property values, and diminished investment in many St. Louis neighborhoods.
While Velazquez asserts, “This isn’t just about penalizing landlords — it’s about securing the future of St. Louis,” the proposal has also raised concerns among property owners and real estate investors. Critics argue that removing the $500 cap could lead to overly punitive measures that deter investment in St. Louis. For small property owners or new investors, the fear is that unlimited fines could become unpredictable and potentially crippling, making it riskier to operate in the city. Investors worry that it might lead to an environment where even minor code violations could result in disproportionately high penalties, pushing responsible landlords out of the market and discouraging new investment at a time when St. Louis needs it most.
Proposition V is part of a broader effort to revitalize St. Louis and protect its neighborhoods. However, its impact on the investment climate in the city will largely depend on how these new fines are implemented and enforced. As Velazquez emphasized, the measure is meant to “stimulate growth, attract responsible investment, and ensure that all property owners contribute positively to the community.” For residents concerned about vacant and neglected properties, Proposition V could mark a significant step forward in making St. Louis a safer and more vibrant place to live, but the long-term effects on the real estate market remain to be seen.
Comments are closed.
