84 Percent of U.S. Metros Post Lower Foreclosure Activity in First Half of 2011

RealtyTrac released their Midyear 2011 Metro foreclosure report showing that foreclosure activity decreased on a year-over-year basis in 178 out of the nation’s largest 211 metropolitan areas which is some much needed good news! Unfortunatley for California, Nevada and Arizona, they just can’t let go of their strong-hold on the top 10 list of having metros with the highest foreclosure rates. Florida is showing signs of improvement however, with only one metro area in the top 2o and that was Cape Coral-Fort Myers and number 12, a great improvement over a year ago when Florida metro’s accounted for 9 of the top 20 metro foreclosure rates in the country. Other metro’s showing up on the top 20 foreclosure rate list were: Boise City-Nampa, Idaho, Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, Ga., Greeley, Colo., and Salt Lake City, Utah.

“Foreclosure activity continued to slow in the first half of 2011, especially in the most foreclosure-saturated markets and in markets where the judicial foreclosure process is used,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “The 20 metro areas with the biggest year-over-year decreases in foreclosure activity were all in states with judicial foreclosure processes — New York, Maryland, Florida, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Illinois.

“These dramatic decreases indicate the foreclosure pipeline continues to be clogged in many local markets across the country, sometimes by a glut of already-foreclosed properties that are not selling quickly, sometimes by a mountain of improperly filed foreclosures that are blocking the inflow of new foreclosure filings — and sometimes by both.”

Top 10 metro foreclosure rates

Las Vegas continues to be the star of the show in terms of foreclosure rates, posting the nation’s highest metro foreclosure rate with one out of every 19 housing units (5.36 percent) receiving a foreclosure notice during the first half of this year which works out to six-times the national average. Reno-Sparks was another Nevada metro area with a foreclosure rate ranking among the top 10 in the first half of 2011. One in every 34 housing units (2.96 percent) in the Reno-Sparks area received a foreclosure filing during the six-month period, the nation’s seventh highest metro foreclosure rate.

Even though foreclosure activity was down from the prior period, Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Ariz., metro area still posted the nation’s second highest metro foreclosure rate during the first half of 2011, up from the seventh highest metro foreclosure rate in the first half of 2010.

Seven California metro areas posted foreclosure rates ranking among the nation’s top 10, led by Modesto at No. 3 with one in every 30 housing units (3.32 percent) receiving a foreclosure filing. Other California cities in the top 10 were Stockton at No. 4 (3.24 percent); Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario at No. 5 (3.21 percent); Vallejo-Fairfield at No. 6 (3.09 percent); Bakersfield at No. 8 (2.78 percent); Merced at No. 9 (2.78 percent); and Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville at No. 10 (2.53 percent).

Trends in the 20 largest metros are encouraging..

Nineteen of the nation’s 20 most-populated metro areas had a year over year decrease in foreclosure activity in the first half of 2011 with Seattle being the only exception, showing almost a 10 percent increase from the year before.

The biggest loser..

Baltimore takes the cake here with a 74 percent year over year decrease in foreclosure activity, pushing Baltimore down to number 182 on the list from 83 a year ago. Washington D.C. followed, droppign from number 67 a year ago down to number 131 in the first half of 2011.

Top 20 Metro Foreclosure Rates — 2011 Midyear

Rate Rank Metro Name Properties with Filings %HU

1/every X HU

%Chg from Jul-Dec 10 %Chg from Jan-Jun 10 Rate Rank Jan-
Jun
10
U.S. Total 1,170,402 0.90 111 -25.49 -29.27
1 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 43,944 5.36 19 -18.10 -17.90 1
2 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 60,985 3.51 28 -8.41 -16.86 7
3 Modesto, CA 5,824 3.32 30 -20.90 -27.51 3
4 Stockton, CA 7,422 3.24 31 -18.21 -25.77 6
5 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 46,959 3.21 31 -16.19 -26.30 5
6 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 4,655 3.09 32 -14.60 -20.90 9
7 Reno-Sparks, NV 5,413 2.96 34 -14.54 -20.44 11
8 Bakersfield, CA 7,633 2.78 36 -20.65 -23.75 12
9 Merced, CA 2,334 2.78 36 -26.35 -37.63 4
10 Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville, CA 21,721 2.53 39 -17.39 -20.36 14
11 Fresno, CA 7,431 2.40 42 -8.87 -10.80 21
12 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 8,699 2.38 42 -44.35 -52.15 2
13 Prescott, AZ 2,475 2.32 43 2.53 -8.60 27
14 Visalia-Porterville, CA 3,199 2.30 43 -14.51 -14.72 19
15 Boise City-Nampa, ID 5,336 2.20 45 -20.43 -16.88 22
16 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 44,160 2.04 49 -18.02 -15.69 30
17 Greeley, CO 1,925 2.04 49 -28.25 -17.52 29
18 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 5,192 1.89 53 -13.02 -16.85 32
19 Tucson, AZ 7,939 1.85 54 1.44 -5.16 39
20 Salt Lake City, UT 7,417 1.85 54 -17.30 -10.38 36

SOURCE: REALTY TRAC

To find foreclosures in your area, click here.

📬 Stay Ahead of the St Louis Market

Get local real estate updates, trends & insights — as soon as they publish.

Homeowners, buyers, investors & agents rely on us for what really matters in STL real estate.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

📬 Want St Louis real estate updates as they drop?

Leave a Reply

St Louis Real Estate Search®         St Louis Home Values

St. Louis Real Estate News        Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc. - All Rights Reserved
St Louis Real Estate News is a Trademark of Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc.

Missouri Online Real Estate, Inc. 3636 South Geyer Road - Suite 100, St Louis, MO 63127 314-414-6000 - Licensed Real Estate Broker in Missouri

The owner and authors this site are providing the information on this web site for general informational purposes only and make no representations, warranties (expressed or implied) or guarantees of any kind whatsoever, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or of any information found by following any link on this site. Furthermore, the owner and authors of this site will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any errors or omissions in information on this site, nor for the availability of this information. Additionally the owner and authors of this site will not be liable for for any losses, injuries or damages in any way from the display or use of this information or as the result of following external links displayed on this site, or by responding to advertisements displayed, or contained, on this site In using this site, users acknowledge and agree that the information on this site does not constitute the provision of legal advice, tax advice, accounting services, investment advice, or professional consulting of any kind nor should it be construed as such. The information provided herein should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax, accounting, legal, or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action on this information, you should consult a qualified professional adviser to whom you have provided all of the facts applicable to your particular situation or question. None of the tax information on this web site is intended to be used nor can it be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
All of the information on this site is provided as is, with no assurance or guarantee of completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.
This site contains external links to other sites not owned or controlled by the owner of this site, therefore the owner of this site does not control or guarantee in any manner the accuracy or relevancy of any information obtained through following such links. Links contained on this site are for users convenience and users should exercise extreme caution when following links. Including a link on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the site linked to or any views or opinions expressed on the site, products or services offered on outside sites or the companies or organizations that own and operate outside sites.
This site may accept payment for advertising, for displaying advertisements, through affiliate relationships with companies or may receive referral fees or commissions from companies as a result of recommending or referring people to a website. This site may also accept free product samples, free services, gift cards or cash to review a product or service. All paid and sponsored content may not always be identified as such. Any product claim, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.