Sitzer Settlement on the Brink? New Appeal Could Reopen Commission Lawsuit

Sitzer v NAR settlement challenged and may be tossed by court

Quick Summary: A new legal challenge could undo the $1.8 billion+ Sitzer/Burnett vs NAR real estate commission settlement. If successful, it could reverse everything the industry has done to comply, and throw home sellers, agents, and brokerages in St. Louis and across the U.S. into another round of litigation and uncertainty.

A key settlement in the Sitzer/Burnett commission lawsuit, the one that was supposed to change how agents get paid, may be on the brink of collapse. Law professor and former home seller Tanya Monestier has filed a formal appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Continue Reading →

Fed Report Sheds Light on Real Estate Commissions as St. Louis Data Reveals Long-Term Downtrend

Buyers Agent Commission Rates

The Federal Reserve’s latest note on real estate commissions adds some national context to trends we’ve seen unfold in St. Louis for decades. While their report shows a national decline in buyer agent commissions from 3% in the late 1990s to around 2.7% in 2022, our local data shows this shift started much earlier and ran a bit deeper here.

In the St. Louis metro area, the median commission paid to buyer’s agents has been on a steady decline since peaking near 3% back in the early 2000s. By 2023, it had dropped to about 2.59%, just before MLS rules Continue Reading →

Attorney Michael Ketchmark Warns NAR Brokers: Repeal Clear Cooperation or Face Legal Action

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce NAR Settlement Strictly

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) is on the verge of making a pivotal decision about its controversial Clear Cooperation Policy (CCP)—a rule requiring listings to be submitted to a multiple listing service (MLS) within one business day of public marketing. Now, attorney Michael Ketchmark, lead counsel in the landmark Sitzer lawsuit, has issued a stark warning: if NAR brokers vote to maintain the rule, he may take legal action against them.

Ketchmark, in an interview with Inman News, made his stance clear: “It’s my expectation that after this meeting, when this comes to a NAR Continue Reading →

Settlement in REALTOR Commission Case Gains Final Approval

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce NAR Settlement Strictly

The landmark settlement in the Burnett (Sitzer) v. National Association of Realtors (NAR) class action lawsuit has officially received final approval from U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Bough on November 27, 2024. This settlement is set to impact millions of homeowners across the U.S., offering substantial financial restitution and mandating significant changes in real estate practices. The full details of the court’s order and settlement terms are provided in the document below.

Judge Bough emphasized the fairness of the settlement, noting that it provides “substantial benefits to the class” while ensuring equitable treatment of all members. Over 491,000 claims have Continue Reading →

Fair Competition in Real Estate? DOJ Takes Aim at Industry Practices

Department of Justice (DOJ)

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is turning up the heat on the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and the real estate industry at large. In a Statement of Interest filed in the class-action lawsuit Burnett v. NAR, the DOJ highlighted ongoing concerns about antitrust practices that could harm buyers, sellers, and competition within the real estate market.

The DOJ took particular aim at the current practice of unilateral offers of compensation to buyer brokers. These practices, the filing explains, pressure sellers to offer high commissions—often 2.5-3%—to buyer brokers to avoid “steering,” ultimately driving up home prices. This arrangement benefits neither Continue Reading →

Court Denies eXp Realty’s Request to Pause Litigation: Key Takeaways

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce NAR Settlement Strictly

A federal court recently denied a request from eXp Realty to pause ongoing litigation while a settlement in a related case was being finalized. This ruling highlights growing concerns over settlement practices in the real estate industry, particularly in cases involving alleged anti-competitive behaviors. Plaintiffs in the case argued that the proposed settlement in the related Hooper lawsuit failed to adequately address claims or consider eXp’s financial resources, potentially leaving affected homebuyers and sellers shortchanged.

For consumers, this decision underscores the importance of accountability and fairness in real estate dealings. As cases like this challenge longstanding industry norms, buyers and Continue Reading →

More Confusion, Less Transparency: Law Professor Objects to NAR Settlement

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce NAR Settlement Strictly

Tanya Monestier, a tenured law professor at the University at Buffalo School of Law and former professor at Roger Williams University School of Law, has stepped into the Sitzer v. NAR lawsuit with a compelling and meticulously researched objection to the proposed settlement. Monestier, whose academic work on contract law and consumer protection has been cited by courts across North America—including the United States Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Canada—brings a formidable legal background to her critique. Her objection portrays the settlement as a superficial, paper-only solution that leaves consumers vulnerable to the same anti-competitive practices it Continue Reading →

The Future of Real Estate Commissions: Transparency and Negotiation Take Center Stage

St Louis Buyers Agent Commission - Real Estate Commission

There was an opinion piece published today on Inman News by Eric Bramlett that suggests that fears of a widespread shift in commission payments from sellers to buyers are overblown. Bramlett argues, “Sellers are primarily concerned with the net proceeds they’ll receive and the overall terms of the contract.” While I agree that many sellers will still “pay” the buyer’s agent commission, I don’t believe the traditional commission structure will endure. In fact, the St. Louis Association of REALTORS® is in the process of updating the forms that most of the St Louis area REALTORS®, including listing agreement. In this Continue Reading →

The Hidden Cost of Savings: Lower Real Estate Fees and St. Louis Home Prices

The Hidden Cost of Savings: Lower Real Estate Fees and St. Louis Home Prices

In a groundbreaking analysis from the National Bureau of Economic Research, a recent report has challenged some prevailing assumptions about the impact of lowering real estate agent fees on home prices. According to the findings, a reduction in agent fees, contrary to what some might expect, could lead to higher house prices. This is because lower future transaction costs enhance the overall value of housing as a durable asset, increasing consumer welfare, primarily benefiting current homeowners over prospective buyers.

For homeowners in St. Louis, this suggests a more complex real estate landscape where the benefits of lowered agent fees might Continue Reading →

Before Touring an Open House, Do St. Louis Buyers Need an Agreement?

Recent changes in the real estate industry have left many home buyers wondering if they need to sign an agreement before visiting an open house. The confusion stems from new practices that have emerged as a result of recent legal settlements affecting how agents work with buyers. The good news? If you’re just visiting an open house on your own, you don’t need to sign any kind of written agreement. The agent hosting the open house is there to represent the seller, not to bind you into a contract.

However, if you decide to work with an agent—meaning they start Continue Reading →

St. Louis Homebuyers: Don’t Get Caught Off Guard by Buyer Agent Commission Changes

The real estate industry is undergoing significant changes, especially concerning how commissions are handled between sellers and buyers’ agents. Recent legal settlements have led to new transparency rules, which clarify that sellers are not required to pay the commission for the buyer’s agent. This has raised concerns among potential homebuyers about the financial burden of paying their agent directly. However, these changes don’t necessarily mean you’ll be paying more out of pocket.

Understanding the Changes:

No Increase in Home Prices: The overall cost of homes hasn’t increased simply because of these rule changes. Home values remain the same. In fact, Continue Reading →

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce REALTOR® Settlement Strictly

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce NAR Settlement Strictly

In a recent telephone interview with an Inman News reporter, Michael Ketchmark, lead plaintiffs’ counsel in the groundbreaking Sitzer | Burnett case, emphasized the importance of strict compliance with the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) proposed settlement. Ketchmark and his team are keeping a close eye on how the real estate industry rolls out these changes, warning that any attempts to evade the new rules will be met with swift legal action. “If anyone thinks they’re going to be able to avoid the application of this settlement agreement and the law by creating some new forms or hiding this cooperation Continue Reading →

St. Louis Sellers: Should You Offer Buyer Agent Compensation?

Should sellers offer buyer agent commission?

forAs a homeowner in the St. Louis metro area considering selling your property, one of the most pressing questions in the current real estate landscape is whether you should offer compensation to a buyer’s agent upfront. This question has gained significant importance due to the recent shifts in industry norms, especially following the National Association of Realtors (NAR) settlement of the Sitzer lawsuit and subsequent MLS rule changes. The outcome of these changes has dramatically altered how real estate transactions are approached, and it’s crucial to understand their implications on your selling strategy.

The Sitzer lawsuit settlement has made it Continue Reading →

Transparency in Real Estate: What the New Rules Mean for You

This week, on July 23rd, the St. Louis REALTORS® Association implemented new and revised contract forms and agreements for use by Realtors throughout St. Louis and the surrounding areas. These updates are a direct response to significant changes in industry practices resulting from the settlement of massive class action lawsuits by the National Association of Realtors (NAR). For a detailed breakdown of these changes, you can refer to the settlement agreement below.

The revisions aim to align current practices with the legal outcomes of these settlements, ensuring compliance and fostering transparency in real estate transactions. One of the pivotal changes Continue Reading →

New NAR Rule: What Buyers Need to Know About Written Agreements Before Home Tours

Starting August 17, 2024, the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) is implementing a new requirement on its members that will impact home buyers and REALTORS® alike. This new rule mandates that REALTORS® must have a written agreement with buyers before showing them any homes. This change is required as part of the settlement agreement of multiple massive class-action lawsuits where NAR was accused of anti-competitive practices. The settlement aimed to increase transparency and fairness in real estate transactions, ensuring that both buyers and agents have a clear understanding of their relationship and obligations. However, there’s a lot of confusion Continue Reading →

Widespread Disapproval of National Association of REALTORS®’ Handling of Commission Lawsuit

Agents and brokers disapprove of NAR

A recent flash poll by T3 Sixty at the NAR Midyear Conference highlights significant dissatisfaction among real estate professionals regarding the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) and its handling of the ongoing commission lawsuit. View the entire report and survey results below.disa

Key Findings: Approval of NAR’s Performance: Only 30% of respondents approve of NAR’s overall performance. A striking 63% disapprove, indicating widespread dissatisfaction. Handling of Compensation Lawsuits: Just 32% approve of NAR’s legal strategies. A majority of 62% disapprove, showing deep concerns about the settlement’s impact.

At MORE Realtors, we understand the confusion and concerns surrounding these changes. Our Continue Reading →

HomeServices of America Settles Commission Lawsuits, Bringing Total to Over $943 Million

Home sellers have reached a momentous $250 million settlement with HomeServices of America and its subsidiaries, including Long & Foster Companies, BHH Affiliates, LLC, and HSF Affiliates, LLC. This settlement, disclosed in a recent press release by the law firm representing the plaintiffs, resolves class action claims as part of a broader dispute over commission costs in the real estate industry.

In a landmark case held on October 31, 2023, a Missouri jury found HomeServices of America, along with the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and Keller Williams, culpable of conspiring to inflate commission fees, resulting in nearly $1.8 billion Continue Reading →

Court Grants Preliminary Approval in Major Real Estate Settlement Involving National Association of Realtors

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce NAR Settlement Strictly

In a significant development in the class-action lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and several major real estate entities, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri has granted preliminary approval for a proposed settlement. This lawsuit, led by plaintiffs Rhonda Burnett, Jerod Breit, Jeremy Keel, Hollee Ellis, and Frances Harvey, represents a class of U.S. homeowners who paid commissions to brokers upon the sale of their homes through multiple listing services during specific periods spanning from 2014 to the present. The court’s decision, as detailed in the document “Sitzer v NAR – Motion for Preliminary Continue Reading →

Will the NAR Commission Lawsuit Settlement Change Real Estate Practices in St. Louis?

Since the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and the plaintiffs in the following lawsuits—Christopher Moehrl v. The National Association of Realtors et al., Rhonda Burnett (originally Sitzer) v. The National Association of Realtors et al., Dawin Niel Umpa v. The National Association of Realtors, et al., and Don Gibson v. The National Association of Realtors—reached a settlement agreement on March 15, 2024, which is still pending court approval and thus preliminary at this point, the topic has dominated industry conversations. The focus of these lawsuits on buyer’s agent commissions has attracted more media attention since mid-March than it seems to Continue Reading →

Will MLS Access Be Untethered from REALTOR Membership?

In the wake of recent legal developments, including a proposed settlement by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) in March addressing buyer agent commissions, the real estate industry finds itself at another critical juncture. This time, attention turns to a lawsuit spotlighted in my article from a week ago, “New Lawsuit Against NAR Spotlights Tying of MLS Access to Realtor Membership in Ongoing Commission Debate“, which challenges the longstanding practice of tying MLS access to Realtor association membership. Unlike the NAR settlement that focused on commission structures, this new legal action delves into the exclusivity of market information access, a Continue Reading →

Court Battle Pits Consumer Savings Against DOJ Objections

The Council of Multiple Listing Services (CMLS), representing over 200 Multiple Listing Services nationwide, has filed a brief supporting the settlement reached between the parties in the lawsuit against MLS Property Information Network (MLS PIN). While this is not the settlement announced last week by the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR), it involves one of the several lawsuits tied to the NAR settlement.

CMLS filed their brief in response to the one filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in February, which opposed the MLS PIN settlement, arguing that it did not go far enough to change Continue Reading →

Important Alert for St. Louis Home Sellers: Are You Eligible for a Settlement Claim in the Recent NAR Antitrust Litigation?

Previously, I wrote about the settlement reached by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) aiming to resolve litigation concerning alleged anticompetitive practices, potentially leading to financial compensation for certain home sellers in St. Louis and beyond. This litigation, which centers on claims of inflated commission rates, could see a transformative resolution pending court approval expected by summer. If approved by the court, this settlement, alongside those reached with other corporate defendants like RE/MAX, Keller Williams, Realogy, and Compass, would provide eligible home sellers a pathway to claim financial redress for the commissions paid during the specified periods. Search St Louis Continue Reading →

NAR’s $418 Million Antitrust Settlement: Will It Face the Same DOJ Scrutiny as MLS PIN Deal?

Legal Counsel Behind Billion-Dollar Verdict Vows to Enforce NAR Settlement Strictly

Last week, I wrote an article about the settlement reached by the National Association of REALTORS® in pending litigation concerning buyer agency compensation. This includes the “Sitzer” (now Burnett), “Moehrl,” and “MLS PIN” suits, among others. As mentioned, this is an early stage in the process; the settlement agreement, although agreed upon by the parties involved, has not yet been filed with the court. Given these are large class action lawsuits alleging antitrust violations, numerous hurdles must be overcome. These could necessitate changes to the settlement terms on the path to court approval—if the court approves it at all.

Hurdles Continue Reading →

Could the REALTOR Settlement Bring More Transparency to St. Louis Real Estate?

Yesterday, I reported on the groundbreaking settlement proposed by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) to resolve the ongoing litigation surrounding broker commissions. Today, I want to dive deeper into the specifics of this settlement agreement and what it means for homeowners and real estate professionals here in the St. Louis area.

Key Points of the NAR Settlement Agreement

Broad Coverage: The settlement class is expansive, including home sellers who listed properties on MLSs anywhere in the U.S. during specified date ranges and paid a commission to any brokerage. For the St. Louis region, sellers are covered if they sold Continue Reading →